Discuss Trowel size in the Canada Tile Advice area at TilersForums.com.

R

rj1884

Hello. Quick question if possible please. Im starting a kitchen for which runs into a hallway. The floor is ok with regards to levels. My question is as its not completely flat should I use a notch trowel with the width 20mm and the depth 10mm half moon shaped or wil this be to much or a 10x10 square notched trowel. If neither would suffice which would you guys use.

many thanks in advance.
 
I

Ian

Yes, before you lay each row, check it for flatness using a long level or feather edge, and if it's not flat, fill the voids using the feather edge, back butter the tiles and fix them down.

The quickest method in my opinion, and robust.

If you're buttering the tiles, the adhesive won't be getting keyed to the substrate. Troweling the floor and back skimming the tiles is much better method and much more likely to acheive the desired solid bed.
 
W

wildeywilde

If you're buttering the tiles, the adhesive won't be getting keyed to the substrate. Troweling the floor and back skimming the tiles is much better method and much more likely to acheive the desired solid bed.

I understand why you've said that, but in fairness, you've failed to address the OP's issue i.e. that the floor is not flat. What you've advised, the normal fixing method if the floor is flat, won't solve his problem, and he'll end up with voids under tiles.

What I've proposed will definitely key (he will have skimmed the floor when he was filling the voids with the feather edge to make it flat, then would be putting down 45 x45 tiles back-buttered with a 10mm trowel, pressing firmly, and twisting).

Have a look in BS5385-1:2009, nothing wrong with back buttering...

At the end of the day, tiling onto an unflat floor is a balls ache. It is always preferable to get it flat (and level if that's a requirement depending on location / application) then fixing is quick and easy. But back in the real world, when customers won't always pay for that sort of prep, there are ways to work around and still get 100% coverage.
 
I

Ian

I understand why you've said that, but in fairness, you've failed to address the OP's issue i.e. that the floor is not flat. What you've advised, the normal fixing method if the floor is flat, won't solve his problem, and he'll end up with voids under tiles.

What I've proposed will definitely key (he will have skimmed the floor when he was filling the voids with the feather edge to make it flat, then would be putting down 45 x45 tiles back-buttered with a 10mm trowel, pressing firmly, and twisting).

Have a look in BS5385-1:2009, nothing wrong with back buttering...

At the end of the day, tiling onto an unflat floor is a balls ache. It is always preferable to get it flat (and level if that's a requirement depending on location / application) then fixing is quick and easy. But back in the real world, when customers won't always pay for that sort of prep, there are ways to work around and still get 100% coverage.

He's already put SLC down so, the floor should be within a couple of mm if he's done it correctly. Troweling the back of the tile is way more time consuming than doing the floor and IMO more likely to leave voids if you haven't buttered right to the tile edge.
 
W

wildeywilde

He's already put SLC down so, the floor should be within a couple of mm if he's done it correctly. Troweling the back of the tile is way more time consuming than doing the floor and IMO more likely to leave voids if you haven't buttered right to the tile edge.

Re-read his original post Bri. He's SLC'd it, but it's not flat, hence he's worried about voids, and wondering whether to use a 20mm trowel. He's discovered what everyone knows, and that is that throwing out a couple of buckets of SLC doesn't magically make a floor level, it doesn't even make it flat. You need to go at least 10mm thick over a whole floor with SLC to get flatness and level, and 9 times out of 10 that isn't practical, or a client won't pay for the 20 bags of SLC that would be needed.

Anyway, you do it your way, I'll do it mine, and when he's finished, the OP can tell us how he did it (no doubt he'll try both and see which works best for his situation).
 
W

wildeywilde

Thanks Gary, I've seen that one. Doesn't show back buttering. Hey, you seem to like videos, so maybe you should do one with two sheets of glass, one to act as a substrate, the other a tile.

Trowel onto the substrate, back skim then fix (as per normal).

The other, skim the substrate, then back butter and fix (as I suggested to the OP).

Then look to see about coverage, and keying. You could even leave them a week then try and pull them apart etc.

Let me know, and I'll be sure to swing by and leave a nice comment... :lol:

p.s. Maybe it's a wording thing? When I say back butter, I mean spread adhesive on the back of the tile using the trowel. So you have ridges, exactly as you would have on the floor. Except they are on the back of the tile. If the floor is skimmed, then I cannot for the life of me understand how anyone could think you won't get a key??? You WILL get key, you WON'T get any voids, so what's the problem???? **yawn**
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread hasn't been replied to for 14 days, so replying to this one may not get a response. Post a new thread instead.

Reply to Trowel size in the Canada Tile Advice area at TilersForums.com

There are similar tiling threads here

Hi, I'm new to the forum and fairly new to tiling, my only previous "proper" job was my recent...
Replies
3
Views
2K
Hi all , it’s been years since last posted for advice and your methods . My question is this ...
Replies
5
Views
538
Hi Some help please What trowel notch size would I need for floor porcelain tiles @ 90cm x...
Replies
1
Views
1K
I'm embarking on tiling a kitchen, wall-to-wall (under washing machine etc). most of the floor...
Replies
1
Views
2K
Hi everybody I wonder if I might ask a couple of general questions please? I am due to fix 6...
Replies
2
Views
2K

Advertisement

Tilers Forums on FB

...
Top