S
Smileysmile
I have a new build house so the bathroom is not big. Its small infact but functional.
Here is my dilemma.
Bath and shower all replaced. Floor to ceiling tiled but few tiles I wasn't happy with had to be replaced (not the best tiler that I hired).
Neutral bone porcelain tiles. 60cm x 30cm.
Tiler had tiled onto the original 18mm chipboard floor so he left a 15mm or so under the bottom wall tiles. The odd tile sunk, grouting cracked. You knew it was going to happen, right? DOH!!
Call yourself a tiler? Well I never knew you shouldn't tile on chipboard etc. So I personally ripped all tiles up with the the chunks of chipboard attached. I replaced all the floor (had to again remove the bath) and replaced with 18mm chipboard.
I now have that gap of 15mm under bottom wall tiles.
I am reluctant on putting new tiles down 'cos of the height between the bathroom flooring (after additionally adding backerboard or ply down) and the landing carpet.
My question is: If I was to lay tiles down which would reduce the gap below the bottom wall tiles so would be a neater fit rather than vinyl (no skirting).
I understand BB would be better than ply but I have read and reread conflicting advice on what size boards to use. 6mm BB would be better then tiles layed on top as not to have much of a height to the landing carpet.
Lastly, If in the future the tiles needed to be removed then if one has to glue the BB to the chipboard flooring then wouldn't this cause problems? Or would the tiles be easily removed from only the BB?
Thanks in advance.
Here is my dilemma.
Bath and shower all replaced. Floor to ceiling tiled but few tiles I wasn't happy with had to be replaced (not the best tiler that I hired).
Neutral bone porcelain tiles. 60cm x 30cm.
Tiler had tiled onto the original 18mm chipboard floor so he left a 15mm or so under the bottom wall tiles. The odd tile sunk, grouting cracked. You knew it was going to happen, right? DOH!!
Call yourself a tiler? Well I never knew you shouldn't tile on chipboard etc. So I personally ripped all tiles up with the the chunks of chipboard attached. I replaced all the floor (had to again remove the bath) and replaced with 18mm chipboard.
I now have that gap of 15mm under bottom wall tiles.
I am reluctant on putting new tiles down 'cos of the height between the bathroom flooring (after additionally adding backerboard or ply down) and the landing carpet.
My question is: If I was to lay tiles down which would reduce the gap below the bottom wall tiles so would be a neater fit rather than vinyl (no skirting).
I understand BB would be better than ply but I have read and reread conflicting advice on what size boards to use. 6mm BB would be better then tiles layed on top as not to have much of a height to the landing carpet.
Lastly, If in the future the tiles needed to be removed then if one has to glue the BB to the chipboard flooring then wouldn't this cause problems? Or would the tiles be easily removed from only the BB?
Thanks in advance.