decoupling works in conjunction with movement joints, it is not a substitute for them.
Consider a room that is heated so that the floor area expands slightly, the decoupling allows the floor surface (tiles and adhesive) to expand at a different rate to the substrate (still colder under the insulation) without putting a massive shear stress on the adhesive. This expansion is taken up by the compression of the perimeter movement joint (even if its only an air gap covered by skirting). It is also taken up by the compression of the movement joint strip in the doorway otherwise all the tiling in the hallway/next room would be pushed away from the heated room.
That all makes perfect sense and is a great explanation!
I avoided the subject of movement joints for one very good reason.
I was always taught that if there is no expansion joint in the substrate then inserting one in the tiling is pretty much a waste of time, and that is the rule I have always followed.
Now many years on, I still struggle with the concept that if you put an expansion joint in tiling, (without there being one beneath) that it will be of any benefit.
The way I reason this is, if for example the substrate is continuous through a doorway for instance (seems to be relevant) and you have expansion from a warm room to a cooler one, the warm room cannot push toward the cooler one because there is no expansion.
So which way will it go? To my mind there is only one way it can go, up!
And no expansion joint in the tiles is going to stop the floor from effectively 'blowing'
For it to work effectively surely there must be one in the substrate too?
I'd really like to know the answer to this because it's baffled me for quite a while now.
Thanks.