Discuss Porcelain Tiles - Staining and water ingress in the Australia Tiling Forum area at TilersForums.com.

P

p20nty

Hi. I have recently partly laid a bathroom floor using 2'x1' porcelain tiles in my home. The tiles are laid on a 3 ply substrate secured at 6" centres on a new 22mm chipboard batroom grade floor. The tiles were wet cut and laid using Ultratile ProRapid flexible tile adhesive. The day following laying I noticed staining of about 70% tiles which could not be removed using proprietary agents - Flash etc. Appeared as though the stain was under the glazed finish. Inspection of other tiles in the same batch does show staining (before laying). A simple water test on the tiles show water will cause temporary staining of the tiles before they dry out, the supplier arguing that this 'is acceptable and normal for their porcelain tiles' - I thought porcelain was impervious to water? However, on the tiles I set out, cut and laid there was no staining apparent at the point of laying them. The supplier argues that I should not have laid a clearly defective producy, but I contend the stains on the tiles I laid were not visibly stained during laying process (otherwise I would not have laid them). It is the consequential issues of the time cost of ripping up the sub floor and relaying alternative tiles that concerns me but not the tile supplier. Can anyone offer advice please.
 
P

p20nty

Yes, I've been careful to avoid naming the supplier - but a big local name. This could very well end up there. The buyer confirmed with supplier that it was a 'defective batch' but all the supplier (to us) is prepared to do is compensate - at cost for the 'unused tiles' - not for the stained laid ones, tile adhesive and 3 ply sub floor boards!! They argue I should have been aware of staining BEFORE tiles were laid. But, I argued that despite marking out tiles (dry and clean) cleaning with clean water after wet cutting and cleaning after laying I should have seen the defects! I would NOT have laid them had the staining been that obvious.



[h=3]
reply_40b.png
[/h]
 

Andy Allen

TF
Esteemed
Arms
18,290
1,318
Gloucester
Im confused. ....you say the staining is under the glaze......polished porcelain tiles are not glazed there a porcelain tile that has been polished some are more porous then others depending on the quality and there fore require plenty of sealing to stop them staining even before fitting..
 
P

p20nty

Perhaps I have used the term 'glazed' incorrectly. I mean sealed. 'Polished and sealed' was the term used when I bought the tiles and would be suitable for bathrooms / showers. The staining appears under the sealed - polished' surface. I noticed today when tiles were removed from packs for further inspection, they were packed in pairs - polished surface to polished surface. And, on some 'pairs' there were 'greasy' type stains, which, when surface wiped, still left marks on the polished (and sealed surface). That's why the supplier has acknowledged the batch was faulty - c80 tiles in total, 60-70% appearing stained to a lessor or higher extent. Point is the tiles I laid, when I laid them didn't manifest staining until following day.



reply_40b.png
 

Reply to Porcelain Tiles - Staining and water ingress in the Australia Tiling Forum area at TilersForums.com

Subscribe to Tilers Forums

There are similar tiling threads here

I had a small leak in the main water line before the stop tap in my 1950s house. The copper pipe...
Replies
1
Views
2K
    • Like
Renovated the bathroom on my 1970 bungalow last year. Took up the old pink floor tiles with sds...
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
Hi there. Wondering if anyone can help? We had a path laid using reclaimed quarry tiles on top...
Replies
4
Views
1K
I've recently bought Johnson 'Orkney Stone' ceramic floor tiles from B&Q. Paid to have them...
Replies
6
Views
1K
Hi All, I am wondering if someone would be able to help me out/explain something. We had a...
Replies
2
Views
2K

Advertisement

Thread Information

Title
Porcelain Tiles - Staining and water ingress
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Australia Tiling Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
23

Which tile adhesive brand did you use most this year?

  • Palace

    Votes: 9 6.1%
  • Kerakoll

    Votes: 14 9.5%
  • Ardex

    Votes: 11 7.4%
  • Mapei

    Votes: 44 29.7%
  • Ultra Tile

    Votes: 17 11.5%
  • BAL

    Votes: 35 23.6%
  • Wedi

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • Benfer

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • Tilemaster

    Votes: 21 14.2%
  • Weber

    Votes: 18 12.2%
  • Other (any other brand not listed)

    Votes: 15 10.1%
  • Nicobond

    Votes: 7 4.7%
  • Norcros

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • Kelmore

    Votes: 4 2.7%
Top