P
Perry
Have made the mistake when I first started but removed them and redone it.
I'm guessing the installer was on a price or on a time...I've always taken my time setting out purposely to avoid problems like this..if you've got a room with a bath, couple of windows and maybe a shower tray then it can take a while to get your head round how it's going to work out and I always discuss the layout with the client beforehand to Makel sure they're happy before I start fixing
BS5385 part 1, 2018
7.1.2 - Bedding materials:
blah blah....
Tiles should not be fixed using the dot and dab technique.
So important, they repeat it in 7.2.1.6 - Tile joints
Tiles should not be fixed using the dot and dab technique.
Think your 50% spread is also out of date:
6.2.3.1 - General
Tiles with a surface area of 0.1 m2, should be solidly bedded.
Tiles with a surface area of less than 0.1 m2, but which weigh more per square metre than 70% of the background's capacity to carry the weight, should be solidly bedded.
Your exact wording above from 7.2.1.5.1 Notched Trowelling method, "this operation has to be carried out correctly to ensure that the adhesive wets the back of the tile and achieves an area of contact of at least 50%, spread evenly over the back of the tile". - This sentence was removed in the last 2018 update.
So yeah, your builder is wrong! Sack him and get yourself someone who knows what they are doing.
OMG Tony, that is perfect !!! I hadn't even thought of it that way but that would make anyone understand !!! Thank you so so muchThink of back buttering as you would butter toast, skimming a thin layer over it. Not dabbing 5 blobs
Thanks jcrtiling. We are in court at the moment sadly. Been ongoing for a year and I think this person is likely to only stop all this if the TTA do a report - completely agreeHave you a failure or are worried about future failure .
But as above if he is still working stop him ..
What is the value of your work if it several thousand it may be worth getting a tta report on the work.
Thank you Julian. I am hoping that the bit about "spread evenly over the back of the tile" and the fact that the entire wall needs to be covered in adhesive should be enough to bat this out. It's a shower area and there should be no voids and the areas should be solidly bedded which i believe part 4 of the standard also states. It's just that the 50% written here is mis-leading surely ?BS 5385-1:2009
7.2.1.5 Application of adhesive and tiles
7.2.1.5.1 Notched trowelling method For situations where dry conditions prevail after tiling is completed, the notched trowelling method should be used. The final bed thickness of the cement-based adhesive should not exceed 3 mm; if it is used at a thickness greater than this, excessive stresses might develop possibly resulting in cracking of the tiles and/or adhesion failure. The adhesive should be applied to the surface as a floated coat with a trowel, pressing the adhesive into the surface, to give a bed
thickness of approximately 3 mm, which should then be combed through with a notched trowel of the type recommended by the adhesive manufacturer: this gives a series of ribs into which the dry tiles should be pressed with a twisting or sliding action; this operation has to be carried out correctly to ensure that the adhesive wets the back of the tile and achieves an area of contact of at least 50%, spread evenly over the back of the tile. Tiles should be fixed before surface drying of the ribbed adhesive bed prevents the adhesive wetting the back of the tiles: the open time varies according to the prevailing atmospheric conditions and is usually about 20 min; it is important not to spread more adhesive on the wall than can be covered with tiles within the open time of the adhesive.
7.2.1.5.2 Buttering method The buttering method can be used for occasional awkward tiling positions, e.g. around openings and restricted areas where a notched trowel cannot be used; where this technique has to be adopted, the adhesive should be spread evenly over the whole of the back of each dry tile with a trowel. The bed thickness should be slightly greater than the final thickness required so that when each tile is pressed or tapped firmly into position the correct thickness is achieved. The thickness should not be greater than the maximum recommended by the manufacturer of the adhesive. Care should be taken to ensure that as far as possible no voids are left behind the tiles.
7.2.1.5.3 Notched trowelling and buttering method The notched trowelling and buttering method combines 7.2.1.5.1 and 7.2.1.5.2 and should be used for fixing large tiles (3.4) and tiles with ribbed, deep keyed or heavy buttoned back profiles. A thin coating of adhesive buttered over the backs should fill the deep keys before placing the tiles in position on the combed adhesive bed. There should be no significant increase in the bed thickness. NOTE This bedding method aims to achieve a solid bed
Hi Paul, It's in the bathroom which includes shower areas.Sorry to bring this up late, but can we just clarify that this is a wall installation and not floor?
Also is it a wet or dry area?
Other than the builder doing it wrong what are the problems that you actually have
Thank you Julian. I am hoping that the bit about "spread evenly over the back of the tile" and the fact that the entire wall needs to be covered in adhesive should be enough to bat this out. It's a shower area and there should be no voids and the areas should be solidly bedded which i believe part 4 of the standard also states. It's just that the 50% written here is mis-leading surely ?
No he used 9mm plasterboard on the wall the shower is attached to (i believe it was 9mm). He said he didn't need to tank it because he was using water resistant adhesive and grout and it will never have a failure and he has never had a leak and he doesn't need to tank it. Which i believe is incorrect. It was standards plasterboard btw.Can I ask if the wet areas have been suitably prepared... tanked etc prior to tiling.
Not exactly, but it could be clearer that is for dry areas only for small format tiles. Dotting and dabbing is not spreading, so that's his argument already out the window regardless.
Initially, part 1 should be followed, but special considerations should be made in specific areas (which the 2009 standards didn't directly apply to), which is when anything in part 4 should be made a priority, until such time that any updates in part 1 match or exceed what part 4 recommends.
So if he was basing it on the 2009 standards, he should also refer to part 4, 2015, which says:
Section 7 - Wet and damp conditions:
7.2.2 Installations in high humidity areas:
Tiles should be solidly bedded in a water-resistant adhesive
7.2.3 Installations not immersed but subject to occasional wetting (reference made to domestic non-power showers)
a) Tiles should be solidly bedded in a water-resistant adhesive
7.2.4 Installations not immersed but subject to frequent wetting (reference made to wet-rooms, domestic power showers etc)
c) The tiles should be solidly bedded so that voids behind them are eliminated as far as possible
And if he doesn't know how to achieve solid bedding, he should revert back to part 1, 2009 to:
7.2.1.5.3 Notched trowelling and buttering method
The notched trowelling and buttering method combines 7.2.1.5.1 and 7.2.5.2 and should be used for large tiles (3.4 (mathematically refers to 60x30 upwards)) and tiles with ribbed, deep keyed or heavy buttoned back profiles. A thin coating of adhesive buttered over the backs should fill the deep keys before placing the tiles in position on the combed adhesive bed. There should be no significant increase in bed thickness.
Note This method aims to achieve a solid bed but, in practice a small number of voids are inevitable. (this doesn't mean a gaping 50% of no contact).
Also as @acaciaguy says, tanking is also advised under part 4, even before it became part of the 2018 part 1 update:
7.2.3 Note 1
For water sensitive backgrounds e.g. gypsum plaster, additional protection in the waterproof tanking system may be considered
Note 2 The use of impervious grouts and adhesives is no substitute for a tanked installation.
No he used 9mm plasterboard on the wall the shower is attached to (i believe it was 9mm). He said he didn't need to tank it because he was using water resistant adhesive and grout and it will never have a failure and he has never had a leak and he doesn't need to tank it. Which i believe is incorrect. It was standards plasterboard btw.
The other wall was tiled before so he tiled over tile on that one
Yeap. That is exactly it. One wall is also tile over tile. AND he has dot and dabbed the mosaic section of the shower area leaving some peaks and troughs in the mosaic and lots and lots of holes because he has tried to push grout into the voids to lift the tiles into position.9mm is a bit thin in my opinion. Unless there is some special reason. However, the thickness issue is overshadowed by dot and dab etc I’m sorry to say the whole install is wrong.
To summarise (and please say if I’m wrong)
You have dot and dabbed tiles on 9mm standard plasterboard in a wet area with no tanking
9mm is a bit thin in my opinion. Unless there is some special reason. However, the thickness issue is overshadowed by dot and dab etc I’m sorry to say the whole install is wrong.
To summarise (and please say if I’m wrong)
You have dot and dabbed tiles on 9mm standard plasterboard in a wet area with no tanking
Believe it or not, this person had threatened us with legal action for not giving him the final payment on his contract (he had had £4000 from us before the job had even really started (my mum is 75 and she gave it to him).In the year since you have had the work done. Have there been any visible issues? Are you hoping for a refund / rectified by builder. What’s the situation in terms of what you want as outcome