R
RDTiling
Hi all.
I’m looking for another opinion(s) on this. A friend of mine posted this picture on facebook, and someone tagged me in a post to look at it. I’ve not seen this in person, as I’m in Edinburgh and the problem is in Horley.
My initial thoughts were that water had got into a crack in the grout and had caused the plasterboard substrate to decay. My friend posted back to say that their landlord had sent a tiler out to look at it and he had pretty much said the same as me. I also added that given it was a shower cubicle, the walls should have been cement backer board or at the very least the plasterboard should’ve been tanked.
The landlord is more interested in saving the tiles than the wall, which I can partly understand, due to probably not having many spare tiles.
The missing tiles came away pretty easily by the tiler ‘poking’ at them so I’m guessing its been going on for a while.
I might be over thinking this (and feel free to tell me If I am) but my concerns are that the amount of work carried out by the tiler is going to be limited by the landlord, which is likely to amount to replace the plasterboard in the affected area and retile. Should my friend be insisting that they carry out further tests on the substrate to see how far the up/across the wall the water had been absorbed by the plasterboard? Exactly how this is done or if it can be done is unknown to me, which is why I’ve posted, as I’ve only been tiling since July so it’s a new one on me.
My other concern is that have a toddler and I’m thinking that if those tiles came out easily with a poke, what it is to stop a tile higher up coming out if the water has spread, if their toddler bangs the wall? The consequences of which could be disasterous.
Any thoughts or opinions on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rich
I’m looking for another opinion(s) on this. A friend of mine posted this picture on facebook, and someone tagged me in a post to look at it. I’ve not seen this in person, as I’m in Edinburgh and the problem is in Horley.
My initial thoughts were that water had got into a crack in the grout and had caused the plasterboard substrate to decay. My friend posted back to say that their landlord had sent a tiler out to look at it and he had pretty much said the same as me. I also added that given it was a shower cubicle, the walls should have been cement backer board or at the very least the plasterboard should’ve been tanked.
The landlord is more interested in saving the tiles than the wall, which I can partly understand, due to probably not having many spare tiles.
The missing tiles came away pretty easily by the tiler ‘poking’ at them so I’m guessing its been going on for a while.
I might be over thinking this (and feel free to tell me If I am) but my concerns are that the amount of work carried out by the tiler is going to be limited by the landlord, which is likely to amount to replace the plasterboard in the affected area and retile. Should my friend be insisting that they carry out further tests on the substrate to see how far the up/across the wall the water had been absorbed by the plasterboard? Exactly how this is done or if it can be done is unknown to me, which is why I’ve posted, as I’ve only been tiling since July so it’s a new one on me.
My other concern is that have a toddler and I’m thinking that if those tiles came out easily with a poke, what it is to stop a tile higher up coming out if the water has spread, if their toddler bangs the wall? The consequences of which could be disasterous.
Any thoughts or opinions on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rich