911 conspiracy theories??

[Mr Tiler]

I have had a lot of time on my hands the last couple of years and this subject is something I have deeply researched im not a nut job 'honest' lol. But everybody seems too busy to think about anything other than work, bills and money money money to realize whats happening to even our once proud nation.

 

[White Room]

I have had a lot of time on my hands the last couple of years and this subject is something I have deeply researched im not a nut job 'honest' lol. But everybody seems too busy to think about anything other than work, bills and money money money to realize whats happening to even our once proud nation.

There is a quote "Keep a nation in fear, keeps them in control" or similar.

 

[Diamond Pool Finishers]

couldn't agree more with that mate there are so many theories which are taken too serious because that is a fact... if you look hard enough you will find it. but in this case I think the evidence is all too blatent and in your face to be ignored or pushed aside. look at whats happening over there now there are thousands of Russian soldier being brought over because they want to disarm all the americans and by law they cant use u.s military to do so, so instead there bringing other troops from foreign nations to set it all up.

Well i have never heard of this Mr T, do you have any evidence you can post to support this statement PLEASE .........

 

[Mr Tiler]

that is exactly the reason I think what happened on 9/11 was a false flag attack. from that incident alone can you imagine how many people are scared to walk out there house because they think a terrorist is around every corner lol

 

[Mr Tiler]

yes mate will try and find some now... there trying to say the Russians will be used purely as security for big events but why the need for Russian soldiers?

 

[CJ]

The US were itching to pile into Iraq/afghan back then.....looking for non existent Weapons of so called mass destruction?

They couldn't just walk in.....they needed an excuse.

The report on the Twin towers was done in secret by a US gov, and no trace of explosives were even looked for, let alone found. 400 truck load were carted away hurriedly......and sent to China for recycling....in so called secret. No independent reports have been done on it.
Experts in all fields have been turned away, architects with 40 years experience in design/fireproofing these high rise buildings have said these buildings would NOT burn or collapse in the way they did......."without help"

I, like most, don't wont to believe these theories, but the evidence saying otherwise has to be listened to.

:smilewinkgrin: Gives me something to do when crap factor is on anyway.

 

[Mr Tiler]

I think I may actually be a nut job! I cant find any solid evidence only hearsay about it all. coat on... see you later lol

 

[Mr Tiler]

I think ive had too many late night theorist video sprees for my liking lmao!

 

[White Room]

I think ive had too many late night theorist video sprees for my liking lmao!

Had the odd session myself:lol:

 

[Mr Tiler]

just goes to show how much I need some work! haha

 

[AliGage]

I do believe it was an inside job and looked into the conspiracy theory quite a bit.
There's lots of evidence and hear say that suggests the US was at least in on it. There's lots of videos and documentaries too. Best i found was "loose change 911" Google it and have a look.

The buildings came down from mid way up the buildings. You can see charges going off in a slow mo of the first collapse. They go off some 20 floors below impact. They collapsed like a demolition. Straight down not impacting any buildings surrounding them.

The steel structure of the building was molten over a week after the incident. The temperature to melt the steel needed to be greater than aviation fuel.

A new insurance policy was taken out on both buildings not long before September 11 covering the buildings from terrorist attacks in particular from planes.

Some of the passengers that were supposed to be on the plane have been found!

One of the jet engines found at the pentagon site not only would not of survived the flames from the crash but was the wrong engine for the modal that hit.

The list goes on...

 

[White Room]

The claim is there was an explosive super nano which melted metal, the reason there was extreme heat for 3 months was the explosive produces it's own oxygen and carried on burning...

 

[Colour Republic]

To be honest most of these 'documentries' can be easily dismissed without too much trouble.

A lot of them plaster the word 'Evidence' all over the programmes, usually in big letters 'EVIDENCE' there you go. However alot of it isn't evidence at all and a quick search can prove they have either fabricated this evidence or used it out of context for their own means. Now who's trying to fool who?

I'm not saying that some of these programmes don't have merit but do try and do a spot check on some of their claims after you have watched them. Pick out a few of the biggest claims and dig deep to check them and check the context. I wouldn't take anything at face value.

I only watched about half that programme so far but if at the end of it, it sounds credible, i'd start checking out the architects that appreared on it and then the bit about not checking for explosives is of course a big claim that I would have thought was standard proceedure in a terrorist attack! They present 'Evidence' that this was not tested for and the Nisk even admitted as such... but back up again. What was and how was the question asked?

If the question asked was "Did you find evidence of explosives in the green sofa which was placed on the 42nd floor lobby" You might expect the answer to come back. "No we did not find evidence of this or even test it". That's very different than saying none of the building was tested.

The bit about 400 lorries a day carrying away debris and it being quickly shipped to China. Did that in fact happen? or did 1 or 2 lorry loads find themselves on a ship to China a few days after because it was not deemed important? and now it is presented as fact. Again it's easy to twist half truths so I wouldn't take any programmes claims as gospel until you've checked parts of their story out yourself.

The trouble with not doing so, is that these claims get repeated very quickly on the internet and then it becomes the 'truth' very quickly.

I've no idea if it was an inside job or not. I certainly wouldn't put it past any govenment to do so but I wouldn't believe these programme makers either.

 

[CJ]

Thermite?

 

[White Room]

Thermite?

Thats it mate....