B
benson
Hi, just after a bit of advice on a tiling job that a professional fitter did for me in my kitchen around 10 months ago.
The flooring was chipboard, and we've had the whole kitchen redone with the fitter doing the floor tiles. I bought a load of 6mm ply assuming that he was going to insist on this as the chipboard creaked in one place (we had the same creaking chipboard in our bathroom and the fitter, a different chap, told us 6mm ply would have to go down first, hence why. Incidentally the bathroom is fine 2years after this was done). When it got round to the tiling, he was going to tile directly onto the chipboard. When I questioned this he said that he could put down the ply if I wanted but didn't really matter either way. In the end the ply board went down first.
The issue is this. The join for two bits of ply has unfortunately been placed directly over the area that was creaking, and predictably the tiled floor now creaks in the same place. This started around six months after it was laid. I've been advised that the whole floor will need to come up and be re-done.
What I'm after if possible is some independent advice as to where I might stand in relation to getting the work re-done free of charge. Is it reasonable to assume that a tiler would do a tiling job onto creaking chipboard and put reasonable measures in place to make sure that it didn't creak once the tiles were laid, or I'm I unrealistic in my expectations? I've asked, and the clear indication from the fitter is that he wouldn't be willing to sort it for free.
Thanks in advance
The flooring was chipboard, and we've had the whole kitchen redone with the fitter doing the floor tiles. I bought a load of 6mm ply assuming that he was going to insist on this as the chipboard creaked in one place (we had the same creaking chipboard in our bathroom and the fitter, a different chap, told us 6mm ply would have to go down first, hence why. Incidentally the bathroom is fine 2years after this was done). When it got round to the tiling, he was going to tile directly onto the chipboard. When I questioned this he said that he could put down the ply if I wanted but didn't really matter either way. In the end the ply board went down first.
The issue is this. The join for two bits of ply has unfortunately been placed directly over the area that was creaking, and predictably the tiled floor now creaks in the same place. This started around six months after it was laid. I've been advised that the whole floor will need to come up and be re-done.
What I'm after if possible is some independent advice as to where I might stand in relation to getting the work re-done free of charge. Is it reasonable to assume that a tiler would do a tiling job onto creaking chipboard and put reasonable measures in place to make sure that it didn't creak once the tiles were laid, or I'm I unrealistic in my expectations? I've asked, and the clear indication from the fitter is that he wouldn't be willing to sort it for free.
Thanks in advance