follow_along_with_video_below_to_see_how_to_install_our_site_as_web_app
Note: this_feature_currently_may_not_be_available_in_some_browsers
Welcome to TilersForums.com, the place to discuss all tiling standards whether British Standards in Wall and Floor Tiling, BS5385, or ISO European Standards for Tile Fixing.
Wall and Floor Tiling Standards for the UK: British Standards in Tiling.
Discuss Long overdue changes to BS 5385 in the Tiling Standards area at TilersForums.com.
Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!Why are they not obliged to state which adhesive isn't meeting standards they advertise!?
Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!
If for instance one of us was to lay a £50k floor
And it was a catastrophic failure, and the adhesive used was the unmentioned one in the article, where would the tta stand?
Cos the adhesive company has not been named, you would go back to them and in true adhesive company style, they’d blame us, unless we could prove different. However as the tta have that information and they haven’t divulged it, does that make them guilty of conspiracy to defraud? I think they’d be on dodgy ground tbh. But what do I know?
They probably cant say because as you say the adhesive company are disputing this and are blaming the test laboratory claiming the reason its failed is because they have taken it out of the packet and used it .Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!
If for instance one of us was to lay a £50k floor
And it was a catastrophic failure, and the adhesive used was the unmentioned one in the article, where would the tta stand?
Cos the adhesive company has not been named, you would go back to them and in true adhesive company style, they’d blame us, unless we could prove different. However as the tta have that information and they haven’t divulged it, does that make them guilty of conspiracy to defraud? I think they’d be on dodgy ground tbh. But what do I know?
Well it makes you wonder where they stand in the eyes of the law tbh H!
If for instance one of us was to lay a £50k floor
And it was a catastrophic failure, and the adhesive used was the unmentioned one in the article, where would the tta stand?
Cos the adhesive company has not been named, you would go back to them and in true adhesive company style, they’d blame us, unless we could prove different. However as the tta have that information and they haven’t divulged it, does that make them guilty of conspiracy to defraud? I think they’d be on dodgy ground tbh. But what do I know?
But I’m not a governing body, I’m joe blogs!So, the tile association have full knowledge that there is potentially problematic adhesive being used out here by unwitting people (could be me, or anyone in here) and they don't share that knowledge?
Say you had evidence that Ford focus cars were faulty and rather than publish that info, you just had a quiet word with Ford (who probably pay you a lot of money each year) would you share guilt if there are accidents by unwitting focus drivers??
Those results would probably have never come to light Tom, been dealt with in House.The article about the adhesive states that one of the four tested failed........ So, it could be a member of the TTA and that would really put a spanner in the works.
The results still haven't come to light though as the 'independent' tester and TTA haven't named the manufacturer - I reckon a whole load of litigation is about to begin if they continue down this route.Those results would probably have never come to light Tom, been dealt with in House.
Does anyone remember the letter by Garythetiler to the TSJ?
The TTA responded in the following edition, and all the did is waffle and play politician. Haha
The best line of all was from Gary,I do. It really irked me then!
The arrogance was oozing out of the editor and you could actually smell it in the ink.
Reply to Long overdue changes to BS 5385 in the Tiling Standards area at TilersForums.com