Ok ok. Last time I am posting. As I said I have had a massive amount of work being done on the house. At no point did the tiler say pay me for the first bathroom before I start the 2nd? It was a case of I asked the tiler to complete the 2 and never thought of paying half way through??? It was my own fault for not being observant enough on the first bathroom, he finished this and went onto second the same day. I am not saying there is anything majorly wrong with the first one, just poor finishing but I have not made too much of a fuss about this.
With regards to second bathroom it would be fair to say he laid out wrong. Along with the window problem, the ceiling line, there are also parts of bathroom where tiles don't line up. These issues I was not aware of until he got up to the window and the ceiling. The first wall looked perfect until he tiled the others and they didn't line up as best as they should. As I say never seen a tile laid in my life and as I also said the tiler is a really nice guy so I put my trust in him.
WHEN we both became aware of especially the window and ceiling situation we briefly discussed it was not right. He offered to knock £60 off! This was on friday and I came on here to seek advice. I then phoned him on the sunday before he returned on monday with the advice he needs to start second bathroom again. Before I mention this he said he had been thinking about it all weekend and HE WOULD not be charging me for EITHER bathroom. I said I would pay for first and he couldstart again on second at his expense. He said no it's ok, I don't want any payment as he had messed it up. He said he does not have time as he has other jobs to go to so could not start again until November.
Now at this point I am stuck, I know I can't get a local tiler for some time havung spoken to the plumber on this. So in order to have a functioning bathroom we had been waiting 3 months for, i asked if he could put up the remaining 2 rows of tiles on one wall and tiles arounf window. he agreed to this and this is what happended.
Now I did offer to pay for first bathroom but this was refused. I now feel this is the correct decision as I will need to pay a plumber to remove furniture again, tiler to remove all tiles and re-do the whole bathroom, then plumber to re-fit again. On my calculations this should amount to the around about the same amount if I had paid the tiler for both bathrooms.
So with this in mind what you are saying I should have paid the tiler for first and then I am out of pocket for re-doing the second???
I will remind you that it was the TILER who said he did not want paid for EITHER bathroom. I was happy and asked him to re-do bathroom and he would be apid for both. The TILER said he was too busy to do this so what am I supposed to do??? As somebody else on here said, he should have cancelled upcoming work, started again on second bathroom all at his expense. I would then be more than happy to pay for all work but this was not an option.
Now I have explained for the umteenth time, do you still think I should be paying him anything??? If I did it was going to leave me out of pocket for his own admission - poor workmanship, somehow I don't think so.
It's an interesting situation i must say. And there ARE valid points to BOTH sides of the debate.
I think a few people have requested that we can see pictures of the first bathroom. I think there would be an advantage of seeing it. It's difficult to gauge everything as a whole without all the information.
It seems very strange to me that your tiler is refusing to accept any pay at all. This screams to me immaturity, and not in a childlike sense, but in a business sense. I think a lot of the tradesman on this forum would agree with me if i said that MOST would sooner put something right and turn a smaller profit perhaps, than walk away leaving an unhappy customer.
The thing that is niggling me is your acceptance of the first bathroom. How bad is it? Other factors like how much you were being charge in the first place is a factor as well.
I understand what your saying and far from it do i feel you should be out of pocket. But regardless of errors on the first bathroom, if the work is acceptable i.e: your not getting the work re-done then i believe the "tiler" is entitled to a financial reward. Allbeit it should be discounted, maybe quite heavily. He maybe quite new to the trade so niavity and inexperience has become a factor. But we've all been wet behind the ears at some stage. His efforts should still be rewarded IMO if the end result is going to remain unchanged.
That being said, There is a lot to be said for checking references and ensure YOU have the right tradesman in to the the job you intend to pay for. So, without trying to get your back up, i think morally you have an obligation to pay something, not accept the embaressing statement of "you don't have to pay me". Like i said this says to me inexperience. He's proberbly petrified of any fallout and things the easiest way to get out of the situation is to cut his losses. I feel a little (not a lot) sorry for him. Perhaps you can direct him to this forum so he can defend himself, and maybe get some advice and help on how to get his business on the straight and narrow.
I think the only way inwhich it's fair not to pay himis IF you are that unsatisified that you get someone else in and pay them to fix the work. If this comes to less than what the tiler was owed, pay him the difference. But, you mentioned that someone stated before, and i believe it was myself. I personally think that the tiler should be back at yours before moving on to rectify your issues to an acceptable
standard, at his cost. He then, and once your happy, should recieve full payment for both rooms.