Hello everyone!
I'm new to this forum, so please be kind
.
Anyway, I am having my ground floor tiled over with porcelain tiles and underfloor heating, and considering whether to use hardibacker or ply.
I've just had the suspended floorboards/joists etc renewed, so the floor is pretty much level, and maybe has a small amount of flex on boards. Initial plan was to lay 12mm/15mm (what thickness is adequate?) ply and tile over. However, we were thinking that the hardibacker might provide better insulation for the undertile heating and make it more efficient over ply? Thats the main motive I suppose for installing.
Also, a Topps Tiles rep we talked to said we could simply screw down the hardibacker without having to use adhesive. That seems to conflict with the information I gathered from this forum, although our floor is already fairly level, can we get away with it? Don't really want to have to buy more adhesive.
Main question I suppose is whether the hardibacker going to provide more efficient undertile heating over ply, we want to minimize heat loss into the cavity of our suspended flooring.
Thanks for your help, keep up the great work!