O
Olz
we know the cicumstances of your case and they were different to jrs case, this lady has a case against jr for damages to her property , a court would accept her defence and if it was provable would find for her, the whole issue would be unpleasant and costly to jr
use a bit of common sense boys there are two sides to every story, remember the golden rule of business , customer care
theres every possibility that this lady will reccomend jr on as she is happy with his tiling and he has been reasonable over this
No they wouldnt, the only defences the court would accept are the three I posted,
I know its a different case, but like I said, there are three reasons and three only, and overpayment isnt one of them.
I stated in my posts clearly that I dont think he should persue it at court, and made it clear that I thought he was in the wrong here for taking on the plumbing work and im not suggesting for one minute that he takes her to court, Im making the points about the three and only three reasons mike because, and the fact that even cancelling a cheque becuase it is the wrong amount is illegal because I would hate someone to read incorrect advise on a forum and get into the mire for it.
If you issue a cheque for the wrong amount you should claim the money back or only cancel the cheque with the PRIOR agreement of the other party and issue a new one. The fact that she isnt happy with the work / price is a whole different issue, but i completley agree the op would have problems if she took it to court, the correct process though would be that he could sue her for the cancelled cheque and he would win. She could start a completley seperate case in respect to the damage to her home and she would more than likely win, but its not a case of the her using the poor work as a defence, they would be treat as two seperate cases completley.
But again like i've said all the way through this thread, the op shouldnt have touched the plumbing work in the first place and the only reason why I am still posting in this thread about the cheque issue is to make sure no one drops themselves in the mire after reading posts on here.
If anyone has any doubts about stopping cheques etc they should read up on the Bills of Exchange act or see their solicitor.