This will be my last post just to clarify my point.
to start with i am not and never have said that tanking is a waste of time. i do however think that tanking is a very important back up to tiling, should the tiling fail the tanking is there to protect the back ground.
On the subject of grout we all know that grout is not water “proof” but that does not automatically mean it will not offer any resistance to the water. my test in this thread showed that a bog standard grout will resist FULL submersion in water for over 6 hours.
I have no doubt that in a domestic shower as long as the grout has no defects it will resist indefinitely.
There has been a misunderstanding somewhere along the line and pics posted of failed tiling and damage to backgrounds but none of that is due to water ingress through a well grouted joint. This sort of damage is more often caused by bad workmanship. I am certain that if you call any grout manufacturer and ask how many failed domestic installations had been caused purely by water ingress through a well grouted joint they would tell you none.
As for water passing through the grout and sitting behind the tiles and the tiling just being decorative this is just stupid if that was true why would we bother having tiles. I asked a BAL rep about it as this is the first time in 30 years of tiling i have come across someone with this misconception and i was told in no uncertain terms that this was not the norm and if there was water behind the tiles this would be a H&S issue. it had nothing to do with the tanking being a H&S issue that is just another example of someone being given information and totally misunderstanding it.