Tanking wall beside bath

[Mossop]

I was just wondering which of the many options you would use when putting up new board on the wall which runs the length of a bath with an overhead shower above the bath?

That is, a wall currently with nothing attached to the stud.

Options appear to be putting up ordinary plasterboard, or plywood, or Hardibacker or AquaPanel or some other cement-based board.

Tanking: do you use the paint-on tanking products or do you use an overlap matting system?

I'd be interested in hearing which method you would use, and if you have any particular reasons as to why you'd choose that substrate and tanking or matting finish?

Thanks.

 

[Qwerty]

I use all different types of tanking but will choose the type that best suits the circumstances....... size of area to be tanked, substrate, weight of tiles, type of tiles, occasional or regular shower use etc etc.

For your situation I would advise you use standard square edge plasterboard and a liquid tanking product as it is the quickest, easiest and cheapest method. It will be adequate for your situation (depending on tile choice of course!)

 

[Albert]

As above🙂

 

[Rookery]

As above

 

[Mossop]

I do have some tapered edge sound reducing plasterboard. I suppose it's better to have square edge plasterboard, rather than cut off the tapered edge?

I have spoken with a bathroom installer on the 'phone and he did say he usually uses plywood on the wall, then tanks this.

If I was getting this installer, do you think it's better just to let him go with what he is used to using rather than insist on using plasterboard? In other words, is there any negative in using tanked plywood over tanked plasterboard?

 

[Flintstone]

Plywood has no place in a wet area, tanked or not. There is no benifit to it but lots of negatives!

 

[Qwerty]

Use plasterboard (or forever hold your peace!)

 

[Bond]

I do have some tapered edge sound reducing plasterboard. I suppose it's better to have square edge plasterboard, rather than cut off the tapered edge?

I have spoken with a bathroom installer on the 'phone and he did say he usually uses plywood on the wall, then tanks this.

If I was getting this installer, do you think it's better just to let him go with what he is used to using rather than insist on using plasterboard? In other words, is there any negative in using tanked plywood over tanked plasterboard?

No need to cut off the tapered edge, butt together and tape and fill flush with board.

 

[Mossop]

Plywood has no place in a wet area, tanked or not. There is no benifit to it but lots of negatives!

What about on the area of wall where a hand shower is mounted?

A bathroom installer I was speaking with said he often tanks plasterboard, though on the area where there is a wall-mounted hand shower he said plywood is good as after many months/years of placing/removing a hand shower on the wall this may have a negative impact on the underlying plasterboard. This should not be an issue with plywood.

What do you think?

 

[Flintstone]

Wood is often ok if it’s behind a waterproof surface