No need for anyone to be confrontational and hissy. Everyone here knows dot'n'dab can fail and we've seen the pictures to prove it. Its going to take a miracle for you to convince others it's ok. You just have to show everyone your method is different to the dot'n'dab that we all know and hate and that it works.
British
Standards is a code of practice. They "recommend" spreading the adhesive so thats what everyone is going to do. If anything ever goes to court, that is the definitive black and white that they'll lean on. And if its not been done, prepare to duck the book when its thrown at you. Spreading is also part of the foundations for many of the adhesive manufacturers guarantees. Ignore that and you ain't got a claim if anything goes ****.
Personally I can still see it being quicker with a trowel. If it needs bedding out, spread the wall/floor and the tiles to double the bed depth. Or even "hover" the trowel away from the wall/floor to increase depth. Or better still, correct the wall/floor before starting.
But saying all that, you'll have a slim chance of convincing more people (even though they won't adopt the method) if you take pictures to back it up. One with the dabs and how you set them out, one with the
tile fixed flat ideally showing the bed depth from the side, and another after you have just lifted it to prove the coverage you have obtained.
Then maybe we can move on and argue about something else. like which is better, Sigma or Rubi.............
I'll get me coat!